News | Entertainment
6 Feb 2026 1:38
NZCity News
NZCity CalculatorReturn to NZCity

  • Start Page
  • Personalise
  • Sport
  • Weather
  • Finance
  • Shopping
  • Jobs
  • Horoscopes
  • Lotto Results
  • Photo Gallery
  • Site Gallery
  • TVNow
  • Dating
  • SearchNZ
  • NZSearch
  • Crime.co.nz
  • RugbyLeague
  • Make Home
  • About NZCity
  • Contact NZCity
  • Your Privacy
  • Advertising
  • Login
  • Join for Free

  •   Home > News > Entertainment

    Prince Harry could reportedly face a bill of more than £1 million over his security funding court fight

    The Duke of Sussex, 39, has been fighting the 2020 decision to downgrade his taxpayer funded, round-the-clock protection when he quit senior royal duties with his wife Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, 42, to move to America


    But it emerged on Monday (15.04.24) the dad-of-two - who has children Archie, four, and two-year-old Lilibet with Meghan - he had lost his initial bid to appeal against the move.

    He is still able to ask the Court of Appeal directly for the green light to challenge Sir Peter's decision - but has been told to pay the majority of the UK Home Office's legal costs of defending his challenge over the decision to change the level of his security when he visits the UK.

    A Freedom of Information request has revealed that by October 2023, the government's legal costs to defend itself against Harry in the case had reached the £400,000-plus mark.

    By that point, the case had already cost the government legal department £265,437 and counsel £137,864.

    The Daily Star has reported it means Harry now faces having to pay back the taxpayer at least £500,000 after losing his challenge.

    It said his own legal costs are likely to be similar, if not more, than that sum, meaning he could end up with a bill of more than £1 million so far in his court fight.

    Harry launched legal action against the Home Office over the February 2020 decision of the ex ecutive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures (Ravec) that he should receive a different degree of taxpayer-funded protection when in the country.

    Ravec's decision came as a result of a change in his status after he stopped being a "full-time working member of the royal family", a judge was told.

    In a judgment in February, retired High Court justice Sir Peter Lane rejected Harry's case and concluded Ravec's approach was not irrational or procedurally unfair.

    Following the ruling, a spokesperson for the duke said he was going to challenge the judgment, adding the bloke "hopes he will obtain justice from the Court of Appeal".

    Harry argued he was "singled out" and treated "less favourably" than others by Ravec.

    He has previously asked to fund his own Metropolitan Police armed bodyguards but officials refused.

    Harry has also said he was unable to return to the UK with his family as it was "too dangerous" after his security was downgraded.

    He is allowed protection when he stays at royal residences or attends official events run by the Royal Family, but has to fund his security if visiting Britain for other reasons.

    © 2026 Bang Showbiz, NZCity

     Other Entertainment News
     05 Feb: The disappearance of Savannah Guthrie's mother is being treated as a "crime"
     05 Feb: Ricky Gervais has mocked Grammy winners for making political acceptance speeches
     05 Feb: Sam Claflin hated filming topless scenes because of his body dysmorphia
     05 Feb: The boss of the Hollywood sign has claimed that CGI was used in a video showing Sydney Sweeney decorating the landmark with bras
     05 Feb: Keke Palmer has no interest in living with romantic partners
     05 Feb: Reba McEntire says that Kelly Clarkson and her children are "hanging in there" following Brandon Blackstock's death
     05 Feb: Carmen Electra's new tattoo is inspired by being "stabbed in the back"
     Top Stories

    RUGBY RUGBY
    Crusaders fullback Will Jordan has dismissed suggestions Super Rugby isn't preparing All Blacks players for the reality of test matches More...


    BUSINESS BUSINESS
    A 53-year-old man's been arrested and charged in relation to a suspicious fire at a commercial premises on Oruanui Street in Taupo's CBD on Tuesday night More...



     Today's News

    Hamilton:
    Three people are injured - one seriously - after a two-vehicle crash near Hamilton Airport 21:57

    Entertainment:
    The disappearance of Savannah Guthrie's mother is being treated as a "crime" 21:31

    Auckland:
    Multiple people are injured after a four-vehicle crash on Auckland's Southern Motorway 21:17

    Entertainment:
    Ricky Gervais has mocked Grammy winners for making political acceptance speeches 21:01

    Entertainment:
    Sam Claflin hated filming topless scenes because of his body dysmorphia 20:31

    Entertainment:
    The boss of the Hollywood sign has claimed that CGI was used in a video showing Sydney Sweeney decorating the landmark with bras 20:01

    Entertainment:
    Keke Palmer has no interest in living with romantic partners 19:31

    Business:
    A 53-year-old man's been arrested and charged in relation to a suspicious fire at a commercial premises on Oruanui Street in Taupo's CBD on Tuesday night 19:17

    Entertainment:
    Reba McEntire says that Kelly Clarkson and her children are "hanging in there" following Brandon Blackstock's death 19:01

    International:
    Democrat victory in Republican stronghold could spell trouble for Trump 18:57


     News Search






    Power Search


    © 2026 New Zealand City Ltd