News | Features
13 Jun 2024 6:24
NZCity News
NZCity CalculatorReturn to NZCity

  • Start Page
  • Personalise
  • Sport
  • Weather
  • Finance
  • Shopping
  • Jobs
  • Horoscopes
  • Lotto Results
  • Photo Gallery
  • Site Gallery
  • TVNow
  • Dating
  • SearchNZ
  • NZSearch
  • RugbyLeague
  • Make Home
  • About NZCity
  • Contact NZCity
  • Your Privacy
  • Advertising
  • Login
  • Join for Free

  •   Home > News > Business > Features

    A Fairer Deal for All on Real Estate Agent Commissions

    Now – with real estate agents hungry for listings - might be a good time for home sellers to negotiate a new way of paying agents.

    This is not about kicking a man when he’s down. What I’m proposing shouldn’t leave an honest agent worse off. In fact, if she or he is good at their job, it will leave them much better off.

    The idea stems from the fact that there’s little incentive for an agent to get you a high price for your home. Their commission doesn’t vary much with price, so they often pressure you into accepting a low price so they can take their share and move on to the next property.

    Under my proposal, if the house goes for a reasonable price, the agent gets the same as now. But if it sells for less, they get a lot less commission. You’re disappointed, but at least you’re not forking out many thousands of dollars to the agent.

    On the other hand, if the house sells for more than expected, the agent is richly rewarded – and that should be fine with you. They have done their job well.

    When Consumer last looked at real estate agents’ fees, it found that a typical deal might be $500 plus 3.8 per cent of the first $300,000 and 2 per cent of the rest.

    If you are selling a house worth $300,000, this translates into $11,900. If the house sells for only $250,000, the agent still gets $10,000 – only $1900 less. If it sells for $350,000, the agent gets $12,900 – a mere $1000 more.

    Here’s how I suggest you change that, assuming you and the agent have agreed that $300,000 is a fair price. Start with the usual $11,900 commission on $300,000. Then propose that for every $1000 under $300,000 the house finally sells for, the commission will fall by $100. And for every $1000 above $300,000, the commission will rise by $100.

    This means that if the house sells for only $250,000, the commission will be a $5000 lower. But if it sells for $350,000, the commission will be $5000 higher. The agent has a strong incentive to bring in a high price.

    You might want to encourage them by raising the baseline a little. Offer, say, $12,500 instead of $11,900 if they sell for $300,000, and adjust from there.

    On a higher priced house, the differences are even starker. If the expected price is $1 million, the usual commission would be $25,900. If the house sold for just $900,000, the usual commission would be $23,900, but under my proposal it would be $15,900 – which, by the way, is still not bad.

    And if the house sold for $1.1 million, the commission would rise from the usual $27,900 to $35,900.

    A bonus of this system is that it will discourage agents from trying to get your listing by exaggerating how much they think you will sell for. They will be highly motivated to give you an honest listing price, and to get at least that price.

    I have to admit that I’ve proposed something like this twice when selling houses, and only once did the agent agree. The other time all the local agents I spoke to flatly refused – making me wonder if there was a slight whiff of collusion in the air.

    These days, though, real estate agents are hungrier for listings. It could be a way of sorting out who is likely to deliver. An agent confident they can get you at least your expected price should jump at the chance of making heaps if they do even better.

    © 2024 Mary Holm, NZCity

     Other Features News
     10 Sep: Spring clean your finances
     13 Aug: Plan ahead to give yourself a debt-free Christmas!
     10 Jul: Wise up to clear credit card debt
     07 May: Ways to prepare for the unexpected
     30 Mar: Time for a financial progress check
     10 Feb: Studying up on NZ Super
     10 Jan: Managing the back-to-school bills
     Top Stories

    Akira Ioane appears in doubt to play for the Blues in their Super Rugby semi-final against the Brumbies as he tries to finish his final season at the franchise with a title More...

    Tauranga-based North Island Mussels Limited's processing plant in Greerton will close, resulting in 139 job losses More...

     Today's News

    Problems with Massey University's online supervised exam software, are not new 6:07

    Denise Richards is making her return to reality TV with a new docu-series 6:05

    Abdullah Joudeh was in Gaza's Nuseirat Refugee Camp 5 when Israeli special forces rescued four Hamas hostages 4:37

    Erik ten Hag will stay on as Manchester United manager following the English Premier League football club's performance review 21:57

    Roger Federer is "happy to be back to regular routines" following his retirement 21:35

    Health NZ is standing by it's processes, despite upset over staff having to pay back money received in error 21:17

    YouTube star Ben Potter has died aged 40 in "an unfortunate accident" 21:05

    Tory Lanez's wife has filed for divorce after less than a year of marriage 20:35

    Bill Nighy led tributes to Sir Martin Amis at a memorial service for the late author 20:05

    Maya Hawke admits filming the final season of 'Stranger Things' has been "heartbreaking" 19:35

     News Search

    Power Search

    © 2024 New Zealand City Ltd