News | Entertainment
17 Feb 2025 23:21
NZCity News
NZCity CalculatorReturn to NZCity

  • Start Page
  • Personalise
  • Sport
  • Weather
  • Finance
  • Shopping
  • Jobs
  • Horoscopes
  • Lotto Results
  • Photo Gallery
  • Site Gallery
  • TVNow
  • Dating
  • SearchNZ
  • NZSearch
  • Crime.co.nz
  • RugbyLeague
  • Make Home
  • About NZCity
  • Contact NZCity
  • Your Privacy
  • Advertising
  • Login
  • Join for Free

  •   Home > News > Entertainment

    Prince Harry could reportedly face a bill of more than £1 million over his security funding court fight

    The Duke of Sussex, 39, has been fighting the 2020 decision to downgrade his taxpayer funded, round-the-clock protection when he quit senior royal duties with his wife Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, 42, to move to America


    But it emerged on Monday (15.04.24) the dad-of-two - who has children Archie, four, and two-year-old Lilibet with Meghan - he had lost his initial bid to appeal against the move.

    He is still able to ask the Court of Appeal directly for the green light to challenge Sir Peter's decision - but has been told to pay the majority of the UK Home Office's legal costs of defending his challenge over the decision to change the level of his security when he visits the UK.

    A Freedom of Information request has revealed that by October 2023, the government's legal costs to defend itself against Harry in the case had reached the £400,000-plus mark.

    By that point, the case had already cost the government legal department £265,437 and counsel £137,864.

    The Daily Star has reported it means Harry now faces having to pay back the taxpayer at least £500,000 after losing his challenge.

    It said his own legal costs are likely to be similar, if not more, than that sum, meaning he could end up with a bill of more than £1 million so far in his court fight.

    Harry launched legal action against the Home Office over the February 2020 decision of the ex ecutive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures (Ravec) that he should receive a different degree of taxpayer-funded protection when in the country.

    Ravec's decision came as a result of a change in his status after he stopped being a "full-time working member of the royal family", a judge was told.

    In a judgment in February, retired High Court justice Sir Peter Lane rejected Harry's case and concluded Ravec's approach was not irrational or procedurally unfair.

    Following the ruling, a spokesperson for the duke said he was going to challenge the judgment, adding the bloke "hopes he will obtain justice from the Court of Appeal".

    Harry argued he was "singled out" and treated "less favourably" than others by Ravec.

    He has previously asked to fund his own Metropolitan Police armed bodyguards but officials refused.

    Harry has also said he was unable to return to the UK with his family as it was "too dangerous" after his security was downgraded.

    He is allowed protection when he stays at royal residences or attends official events run by the Royal Family, but has to fund his security if visiting Britain for other reasons.

    © 2025 Bang Showbiz, NZCity

     Other Entertainment News
     17 Feb: Katie Price doesn't think she will make it to "be an old lady"
     17 Feb: Katie Price has labelled men as her "downfall" in life
     17 Feb: Vanessa Lachey always reminds her husband Nick Lachey of their age gap
     17 Feb: Jennie Garth is "ready to leave" Los Angeles
     17 Feb: Beyonce's nephew Julez Smith wants to "protect" his younger family members
     17 Feb: Justin Bieber is "happier than he has been in a long time", according to an insider
     17 Feb: Teddi Mellencamp reunited with her estranged husband just before she had brain tumour surgery
     Top Stories

    RUGBY RUGBY
    New Zealand Rugby CEO Mark Robinson believes Joe Schmidt won't be lost to Australian rugby when he steps down as head coach at the end of the Rugby Championship More...


    BUSINESS BUSINESS
    An economics expert says cutting the Official Cash Rate is unwarranted More...



     Today's News

    Accident and Emergency:
    Fire crews continue to battle a four-hectare fire in Port Waikato's Maunsell Road, that started in toe toe scrub 21:57

    Entertainment:
    Katie Price doesn't think she will make it to "be an old lady" 21:54

    International:
    Here's what we know about the accelerating Ukraine peace talks 21:47

    Entertainment:
    Katie Price has labelled men as her "downfall" in life 21:24

    Politics:
    The Prime Minister's dismissing possible disagreement between Education Minister Erica Stanford, and her Associate David Seymour 21:17

    Entertainment:
    Vanessa Lachey always reminds her husband Nick Lachey of their age gap 20:54

    International:
    Why we mourn childhood stages and how to not dwell in it 20:37

    International:
    Indonesia 'very worried' about foreign criminals after alleged assaults at Finns Beach Club in Bali 20:37

    Entertainment:
    Jennie Garth is "ready to leave" Los Angeles 20:24

    Entertainment:
    Beyonce's nephew Julez Smith wants to "protect" his younger family members 19:54


     News Search






    Power Search


    © 2025 New Zealand City Ltd