At a glanceExpert`s Rating Pros Attractive industrial design Rechargeable battery Excellent keypad/fingerprint reader add-on Reasonably priced Cons Extremely loud during operation App runs very slowly Subscription required for Wi-Fi connectivity Our Verdict This petite retrofit smart lock is a discreet choice for just about any environment, though it’s incredibly loud and its app drags. Price When Reviewed This value will show the geolocated pricing text for product undefined Best Pricing Today Best Prices Today: Nuki Smart Lock Retailer Price Check Price comparison from over 24,000 stores worldwide Product Price Price comparison from Backmarket Best Prices Today: Check today’s prices Nuki has been producing smart locks for Europeans since 2015 and is only now entering the U.S. market. With 10 years of development under its belt, Nuki has reached a level of sophistication that few competitors can boast of—and stateside homeowners get to skip the awkward growing pain years that mar so many early-generation smart home products. The U.S. release of the Nuki Smart Lock is the fifth generation of the product, and it has evolved considerably from its initial design, which had a large battery pack fused to its underside. It now looks like a shrunken version of the now-classic August Smart Lock. Like the August, the Nuki is a retrofit lock that replaces only the interior escutcheon on your door, leaving the exterior as is. As such, it carries no ANSI or BHMA ratings, which aren’t issued for retrofit locks. The Nuki Smart Lock replaces your existing deadbolt’s interior escutcheon; noting else about your lock changes–except that you’ll now be able to open it with an app or with the keypad accessory if you add that to your purchase. Nuki Also like the August, the lock is designed as a cylinder that turns in its entirety to lock and unlock the deadbolt, although measuring just 2.25 inches across, small hands will find it much easier to grip compared to the rather thick August. Anyone shopping for a retrofit smart lock is likely to also consider the Level Bolt, which is even less visually obtrusive than the Nuki Smart Lock. I’d say the biggest advantage the Nuki offers over both August’s and Level’s offerings is its rechargeable battery. More on that in a bit. The Nuki Smart Lock works exactly as you’d expect: Just rotate the lock one way or the other to engage or disengage the lock, as you would with a regular thumbturn. Installation and setup Installation proceeds much like any other smart lock, although Nuki does not include printed instructions with its packaging. Rather, you only get a QR code printed on a slip of cardboard—and because I reviewed this lock before the Nuki officially launched, scanning it took me only to the home page of Nuki’s website. I presume future users will have a more elegant experience, but in any case, I find smart locks to be much easier to set up when you have printed installation instructions, regardless of how sophisticated the app is. Nuki’s app is well designed and easy to use.Christopher Null/Foundry The Nuki app at least does a passable job at walking you through setup. That, combined with years of experience reviewing similar products, I was able to get the lock mounted on the door without much trouble. The process includes attaching an adjustable frame to the door, then using your existing lock’s bolts to connect through your current deadbolt and into the exterior escutcheon. (Unlike some other lock producers, Nuki doesn’t provide the extra bolts that I always appreciate having on hand.) Next, you choose one of three included adapters to slip into this frame and attach to the lock’s tailpiece, depending on its shape, and then you just clip the Nuki lock directly into the frame, with no extra hardware required. There are a few extra pieces in the box whose function I wasn’t entirely sure of (again, no manual), but they appear to be designed for use with locks that have longer than standard tailpieces. The good news is that, presuming you have a standard door and lock, the entire affair goes together with just two screws. A rechargeable battery The Nuki Smart Lock has a rechargeable battery, so you won’t want to misplace the proprietary USB-C cable you’ll need for that purpose.Christopher Null/Foundry The Nuki lock is a sealed device with a rechargeable battery inside. Nuki says the battery should offer up to 12 months of life before it needs a refill via a magnetic cable with a USB-C plug on the other end. Just clip the cable to the charging point on the underside of the lock, connect the other end to a power source, and it’s off and running. The lock can be charged while on the door if you have power nearby (which allows the lock to continue operating), or popped off via a concealed button and charged elsewhere. Note that the charging cable is only about 6.5 feet long, and no A/C adapter is included. While the convenience of the magnetic charger is nice, I’d have been happier with a standard USB-C port, which would allow me to use my own (longer) cable—I’d also worry less about misplacing Nuki’s. Using the Nuki Smart Lock Nuki Physically, the lock works exactly as you’d expect: Just rotate the lock one way or the other to engage or disengage the lock, as you would with a regular thumbturn. (A calibration mechanism during setup automatically orients the rotation direction.) There’s also an illuminated button on the face of the lock that can be pressed to initiate a lock or unlock sequence without needing to twist the lock itself. Tapping the button gently causes a ring around it to illuminate: A solid circle means the lock is engaged; a U-shaped design means the lock is open. (When the door is unlocked, an LED flashes periodically as a gentle reminder; when the door is locked, all lights remain off.) Nuki’s app is a little convoluted but reasonably easy to master, starting with a walkthrough that connects the lock to both Bluetooth and your 2.4GHz Wi-Fi network. A (lengthy) checklist system then steps you some basic settings before throwing you into the management system. By default, you can either swipe left or right on the app’s home screen to lock or unlock the door, or tap once to access the ability to lock or unlock with a second tap. This LED light ring illuminates to inform you of the lock’s status: A solid ring indicates a locked state, while a half-circle means it’s unlocked.Christopher Null/Foundry The settings menu gives you deep-dive access into advanced features such as fine-grained control over how the button on the lock face works, a night mode that automatically locks the door at night, an auto-unlocking or auto-locking scheduling system, and an automatic lock timer that re-locks the door after it’s unlocked (settable from 30 seconds to 30 minutes). I didn’t have trouble with any of these modes. A geofencing auto-unlocking system is also available, which was mostly effective at registering my arrivals during my testing. Note that through all of this you will be faced with a barrage of come-ons for Nuki Premium, a subscription service whose purpose might not immediately be apparent. Turns out Nuki Premium ($5.90 per month month) is required if you want to use any of the lock’s features over Wi-Fi and to receive real-time activity alerts. Plot twist: This plan is free for life if you buy the lock and enroll in the program prior no later than September 30, 2025. Add-on devices We tested the $159 Nuki Smart Lock with its fingerprint-reader keypad, a $149 option. You can purchase both items as a bundle for $229–a substantial discount over buying the two devices a la carte.Christopher Null/Foundry The Nuki lock offers several add-on peripherals: an external numeric keypad ($59), a keypad/fingerprint reader combo ($149), and a door sensor ($59). I received the keypad/fingerprint reader with my test lock; it’s available as a bundle with the lock for $229. I found the slim keypad to be elegant and effective, with buttons that emit a reassuring click when pressed along with a reliable fingerprint reader. The six LEDs across the top are especially handy, as they illuminate, one by one, when you enter a PIN, so you know for sure that your digits were successfully entered. Oddly, all PINs must be precisely six digits long. User management is a little haphazard, as permissions must be set per device—lock or keypad—separately. With the lock, you can share app-based access (which can be time restricted based on hours of the day and day of the week), which creates a QR code that you send along via other means. With the keypad, access can be configured with a PIN or both PIN and fingerprint (but not just fingerprint), and this access can also be similarly time-restricted. Up to 200 PINs are allowed, but only 20 fingerprints. There is no option to create one-time access codes. If you don’t like the Nuki app, note that the lock also supports Matter over Thread, and I was easily able to connect it to an Apple Home ecosystem. As with most smart locks controlled over Matter, all you can really do is lock and unlock the door (as well as receive iOS notifications about those changes), but this is nonetheless a convenient option if you don’t want to dig into the Nuki app just to open the door. Considering the Nuki app is often quite slow, having this available, at least as an option, is a good idea. This review is part of TechHive’s in-depth coverage of the best smart locks. Should you buy the Nuki Smart Lock? My only major issue with the Nuki lock is how loud it is. When I first heard it in action, I thought there was something wrong with it; but no, that’s just how the motor sounds: a lot like an old-school dot matrix printer. If you’re not expecting it, the abrupt, grinding noise can even make you jump a bit. At $159 (for the lock alone), Nuki is competitive in price with August’s flagship lock and most other retrofit locks, but it’s much less expensive than the Level Bolt with Bluetooth + Matter ($229, plus $59 for a numeric keypad). Like that lock, the Nuki’s petite, inobtrusive presentation makes it an appealing choice for homeowners with a strong sense of aesthetics. That said, there’s room for improvement with the scattered and ploddingly slow app—and something must be done about the noisy motor. Read...

Every year, we look forward to July because it brings Amazon’s annual Prime Day with it—and that means deep, delicious discounts for all kinds of tech. Right now, we’re still a few days away from the big event (which runs July 8-11), but we’re already seeing some killer early Prime Day flash drive deals. Everyone needs a great USB flash drive, and Prime Day is an excellent time to grab one for cheap. I’ve been a journalist for 19 years, with 13 of those years focused on consumer technology. I love sifting through deals and spend every day hunting down the very best sales on the very best tech. With Prime Day, I’m exercising those muscles to help you find the best USB thumb drives worth your money. These hand-curated recommendations take price, reviews, and brand reputation into consideration. Best early Prime Day deals on 64GB to 256GB flash drives Samsung Fit Plus, 128GB, USB 3.1 — $15 (35% off, was $23) SanDisk Ultra, 128GB, USB 3.0 — $12 (23% off, was $15.49) Samsung Type-C, 128GB, USB 3.2 — $18 (22% off, was $23) Lexar JumpDrive Dual, 128GB, USB 3.2 — $19 (14% off, was $22) Amazon Basics, 256GB, USB 3.1 — $11 (45% off, was $20) PNY Turbo Attache 3, 256GB, USB 3.0 — $11 (45% off, was $20) Samsung Bar Plus, 256GB, USB 3.1 — $22 (45% off, was $40) Kingston DataTraveler Kyson, 256GB, USB 3.2 — $25 (15% off, was $30) PNY Elite-X Fit, 256GB, USB 3.1 — $23 (12% off, was $26) The best deal of the lot is for the Samsung Bar Plus, where you can get 256GB of storage space for just $22. This is a super-fast flash drive that can reach up to 400 MB/s transfer speeds, comes with a rugged metal casing, and is even waterproof and shockproof. If you want a more affordable option, the Amazon Basics for $11 is a decent cheapie. Best early Prime Day deals on 512GB to 2TB flash drives SanDisk Ultra Flair, 512GB, USB 3.0 — $37 (21% off, was $47) Samsung Fit Plus, 512GB, USB 3.2 — $60 (25% off, was $80) PNY Pro Elite V3, 512GB, USB 3.2 — $54 (11% off, was $61) SanDisk Ultra Fit, 512GB, USB 3.2 — $40 (20% off, was $50) SanDisk Ultra Dual Drive Go, 1TB, USB 3.2, both USB-A and USB-C connections — $74 (32% off, was $110) SanDisk Extreme Pro, 1TB, USB 3.2 — $110 (25% off, was $145) A superb pick off this list is the Ultra Dual Drive Go from SanDisk. This is a flash drive with both USB-C and USB-A connectors, thus it’s a lot more versatile. It can reach up to 400 MB/s read speeds, too! USB flash drive deals FAQs 1. What capacity do I need in a USB flash drive? This is a question that you need to answer yourself because it really depends on what you plan to use it for. If you’re only moving work documents around, a small capacity like 64GB will be fine. If you want to use a flash drive for backing up photos, videos, games, and other big files, then you might want to go 512GB or larger. 2. What features should I prioritize when choosing a USB flash drive? First of all, our recommendation is to look at the flash drive’s transfer speeds. To ensure you get fast read/write speeds, you should get a USB 3.0 or above. USB 2.x drives are sorely outdated. Then, you have to make sure the flash drive can survive living in your pocket, getting crushed by your laptop, falling through your fingers, and so on. Aluminum casings will offer better protection in such cases. If the flash drive offers 128-bit AES encryption or better, your data will also have some extra protection in case you lose it, as the drive will be inaccessible and block out others from reading your data. 3. How did we find the best USB flash drive Prime Day deals? Finding great deals can be difficult because not all discounts are worth covering. When looking for good Prime Day deals, we compare the prices on Amazon with the regular retail price and check pricing history to see if there have been any changes lately and that the price drops are truly noteworthy. We also check product reviews to see if they’re reliable in the long run and live up to their promises. Read...

If you’ve been itching to upgrade your computer’s internal storage at a great price, your day has come. Samsung’s super-speedy 990 EVO Plus just dropped to its all-time best price, plummeting down to a mere $235 for the 4TB model. That’s 28% off the MSRP. In our review of the Samsung 990 EVO Plus, we gave it a 4-star rating despite our verdict that it’s a fantastic daily driver SSD with excellent performance and fast data speeds, able to read at up to 7,250 MB/s and write at up to 6,300 MB/s. Why the missing star? Because it was too expensive at the time. But with this hefty discount, it’s a phenomenal buy—one that will have you booting up, loading apps, and transferring files in record time. It also doesn’t hurt that it’s compatible with both PCIe 4.0 x4 and PCI 5.0 x2, which means it offers some future-proofing in case you ever upgrade your PC or swap to a newer one. Act fast to get the 4TB Samsung 990 EVO Plus for only $235. But it’s not just the 4TB model that’s on sale. If you want to spend less, you can also score the 1TB version for only $80 (was $110) and the 2TB version for only $140 (was $177). If none of these suit you, check out PCWorld’s picks for the best SSDs for all price ranges. Samsung`s ultra-fast 990 EVO Plus just hit its best-ever priceBuy now at Amazon Read...

Apple gets a lot of flak for not adding touchscreens to their MacBook laptops, but the reason for this decision is pretty darn sound even if it annoys some people. Windows laptops with touchscreens get dirty at the drop of a hat and add weight to the notebook itself. I think Apple’s actually on the right track here. Because I know I’m probably in the minority, but touchscreen laptops suck. Why Apple’s making the right call Sometimes the best feature is the one that’s left out, and I fully stand by that statement. I believe the reason behind MacBooks ignore touchscreens comes down to ergonomics and costly redesigns. I mean, let’s be real, it gets physically uncomfortable to lift your arm and tap the screen, especially if you’ve been repeating the same motion for hours. It’s an unnatural movement. A trackpad or mouse is much more ergonomic. As for costly redesigns, well that’s a whole other thing. If Apple were to start adding touchscreen displays to their MacBooks, they’d likely be thicker and heavier because you’d now need new internal bits for the touch input. You’ve got to put more engineering time in it now, which ups both the cost and the weight. This kind of rails against MacBooks and what they’re known for, which are their sleek and portable designs. It misses the point entirely. Eugen Wegmann I don’t believe Apple’s decision is one that stems from a place of stubbornness (or a desire to avoid cannibalizing iPad sales), it’s about prioritizing making a better laptop. Honestly? I totally get it. Not every company needs to jump on the next big trend just because everyone else is doing it. Sometimes, less really is more. Touchscreen laptops might seem premium on paper, but they’re overhyped Laptop makers really love to hype up touch displays as a tech-forward, premium feature, especially on 2-in-1 models that flip around to function like a tablet. The thing is, most people don’t need a touchscreen. The only exceptions are digital artists or note-takers who use it as a canvas or digital notebook. For everyone else, you end up with a smudgy screen, a heavier laptop, and shorter battery life. Nothing sets me off faster than visible fingerprints. Whether they’re on my glasses or laptop screen, they make me want to tear my hair out–especially if I’m in the middle of something important and have to stop what I’m doing to hunt down a microfiber cloth. (Those dang things seem to vanish the second you need them.)  Like every other smudge-prone human on the planet Earth, I leave fingerprints on just about everything, and it’s a daily frustration. If my laptop screen shows any smudges while I’m watching anime with my husband (a nightly tradition in this household), some inner compulsion kicks in–I’ll pause the show just to wipe them off. The funniest part of this story is that I don’t even use the touchscreen all that much. I naturally default to either the trackpad or an external mouse. check out pcworld`s top ultraportable pick Microsoft Surface Pro 2025 Read our review Best Prices Today: $769.99 at Amazon Touchscreens drain the battery and add bulk Beyond the annoyance of fingerprints, touchscreens come with other trade-offs. First off, they’re just heavier laptops. The glass layer inside needs to be durable and thick enough to withstand all the prodding, which adds weight to the laptop. The sensor grid (the part that detects your finger) also adds heft since it’s another electronic component that gets sandwiched in there. Finally, these laptops require stronger hinges (reinforced = more material) to prevent the screen from wobbling when it’s in tent or clamshell mode.  Touchscreens do a number on the battery life, too. Even when you’re not using the touchscreen, the sensor grid goes into standby mode as it waits for touch input. This mode continues to draw power and quietly sip the battery life. Touchscreen laptops also have glossy displays, so you’ll need to crank up the brightness if you’re using it in a room with a lot of sunlight. The reflective glare from glossy displays can be a real pain in the neck. All of this really impacts the battery. Mark Hachman / IDG It’s the worst when you accidentally brush the screen. This seems to always happen when my husband and I are kicking back after a long day. Sometimes I get passionate about some weird topic and start throwing my hands around, which ends up with me whacking the display. Suddenly, I’m on some random page or YouTube video and I’m totally thrown off. While it only takes me a few seconds to remedy the situation, it still makes my eye twitch with slight frustration. Who actually needs a touchscreen? check out pcworld`s top pick for content creation Asus ProArt P16 Read our review Best Prices Today: $2,269 at Amazon I’m pretty anti-touchscreen, that’s true, but I also have to recognize the other side of this and that’s the people who benefit from them. Digital artists and educators need them for sketching, taking notes, or scrolling through presentation slides. They’re also great for accessibility users that need the extra flexibility and control they uniquely offer. This is all totally valid and if a touchscreen works for you, then who am I to tell you not to use them? You do you, stylus and all. Apple’s missing feature is its biggest win Apple’s refusal to add touchscreens to MacBooks might frustrate some folks, but I see it as a smart and thoughtful choice. The best designers are often the ones that know when to pull back, and I think that’s the case here. Keep touchscreens away from my computers. I’d rather have a lightweight laptop than a chunkier laptop covered in the natural oil from my fingertips. Read...

Prime Day is closing in with speed and we’re already seeing impressive discounts left and right, including this one: a powerful Beelink SER8 mini PC for $499. This sale—a punchy 21% off the usual $629—is for Prime members only, but you can take advantage of it (along with all the other Prime Day deals coming next week) with a free 30-day Prime trial. The Beelink SER8 mini PC is suitable for pretty much everything, including your day-to-day work, web browsing, video streaming, and even some gaming. The Ryzen 7 8745HS processor and chunky 32GB of DDR5 RAM offer responsive performance, plus the Radeon 780M integrated graphics can push modest frame rates. (My own mini PC can run old-school WoW on it with graphics set to medium quality.) It’s rounded out by a 1TB SSD, andn you can self-upgrade to a whopping 256GB of RAM and 8TB of storage if the out-of-the-box specs aren’t enough for you. It’s especially great for multitaskers and workstation fiends because it can power triple 4K@120Hz monitors via HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 1.4, and USB-C (USB4) video. Lots of mini PCs can do triple 4K now, but not many can run 4K at up to 120Hz like this one can. Other ports include two high-speed USB-A, two slower USB-A, a fast USB-C, 2.5G LAN, and double 3.5mm audio jacks (one front, one back). This mini PC blows every comparably priced laptop out of the water, so if you’re looking for an excellent home office machine, don’t pass up this opportunity. Get the Beelink SER8 for $499! (Remember, it’s a Prime deal so start a 30-day free trial if you aren’t a Prime member, then use the free trial to jump on next week’s Prime Day sales event!) Save 21% on this high-performance Ryzen 7 mini PC with 32GB RAMBuy now at Amazon Read...

I recently inherited an old monitor that a friend was going to recycle as e-waste after he upgraded. It was a decent brand with a 1080p resolution and a refresh rate that I figured was passable for casual gaming. I was excited about the prospect of having a secondary display, so I was grateful for the generosity. The display’s image looked fine to me. But, being a tech guy, I thought I’d also run some diagnostics to check on its color, contrast, and resolution. One of the tests I ran was to look for dead or stuck pixels, which I’ve heard can haunt some monitors. Low and behold, I uncovered a few stuck pixels lurking to the left of center. They weren’t anything to cry home about, being just a few tiny dots — some monitors have it so bad that they’re almost unusable — but I set about fixing them anyway using a site called Piksel Test. I managed to get rid of them all too, so I’m going to use this test on all the screens I get from now on. If you’re in a similar boat with any of the screens you own, be that a monitor, cellphone, TV, or tablet (LCD or OLED screen), you can do the same thing. What to do Turn on your PC and wait for Windows to load. Connect to the internet and go to the Piksel Test website. Click on the Test Dead Pixel button. Take note of any dead or stuck pixels on your screen. The website has an explanation about how to identify each of those problem pixel types. Now scroll down the Piksel Test page and click on Dead Pixel Repair or Stuck Pixel Repair depending on what kind of pixels you discovered. Run the pixel fixer window over the pixels you want to repair for 10 minutes. Keep the pixel fixer window on the stuck or dead pixels for approximately 10 minutes.  Dominic Bayley / Foundry Tip: Your screen needs to be active for the duration of the fix, so turn off your sleep settings in Windows before you begin. That’s all for this tip. If you’re looking for more tech tips like this one — that is, short, digestible tips that you can try yourself at home, head on over to PCWorld’s newsletter page and register for our Try This newsletter. Read...

Cybercriminals are exploiting GenAI and Vercel`s v0.dev to rapidly create realistic phishing sites, raising the threat of large-scale, sophisticated attacks. Read...

At a glanceExpert`s Rating Pros Sharp, colorful QD-OLED panel 120Hz refresh rate with Adaptive Sync Excellent five-speaker sound system Good HDR with Dolby Vision support Undercuts competitors on price Cons Video connectivity limited to two video inputs Limited downstream USB connectivity, as well Could use more image quality options Not as bright as alternatives in HDR Our Verdict The Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED delivers great image quality, solid audio, and good motion clarity, yet undercuts most competitive 32-inch 4K OLED monitors on price. Price When Reviewed This value will show the geolocated pricing text for product undefined Best Pricing Today Best Prices Today: Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED Monitor S3225QC Retailer Price $821.24 View Deal Price comparison from over 24,000 stores worldwide Product Price Price comparison from Backmarket Best Prices Today: Check today’s prices 32-inch 4K QD-OLED monitors are among the most alluring computer monitors ever sold. They all provide exceptional contrast and color alongside sharpness and a big, bold display size. The catch? Often, it’s the price, as many models have an MSRP above $1,000. The Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED, however, undercuts competitors with a rock-bottom MSRP of $849.99. That makes it easy to look past the monitor’s downsides. Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED S3225QC specs and features The Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED’s basic specifications are typical for a 32-inch QD-OLED monitor. It provides 4K resolution (3840×2160) and a 120Hz refresh rate with Adaptive Sync. Display size: 32-inch 16:9 aspect ratio Native resolution: 3840×2160 Panel type: QD-OLED Refresh rate: Up to 120Hz Adaptive Sync: Yes, Adaptive Sync, AMD FreeSync Premium Pro HDR: HDR10, Dolby Vision, VESA DisplayHDR True Black 400 Certified Ports: 1x HDMI 2.1 with FRL/HDR/VRR, 1x USB-C upstream with DisplayPort 1.4 and 90 watts of Power Delivery, 2x USB-C 5Gbps downstream with 15 watts Power Delivery Audio: 3D Spatial Audio speakers included, total 25 watts output Price: $849.99 MSRP A closer look at the details, however, reveals many differences between other 32-inch 4K QD-OLED displays. The Dell supports both HDR10, which is common, and Dolby Vision, which is unusual. It also has just two video inputs, which is roughly half as many as the average competitor. But the monitor strikes back with a five-speaker spatial sound system with a total power of 25 watts. By comparison, most similar monitors have a pair of 2-watt stereo speakers, if they have any at all. Dell’s pricing is low given the monitor’s features, as it carries an MSRP of just $849.99. Most other 4K QD-OLED monitors have an MSRP between $999.99 and $1,299.99, though sale pricing can bring some models (like the Samsung Odyssey OLED G80SD) close to the Dell 32 Plus 4K. Read on to learn more, then see our roundup of the best monitors for comparison. Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED S3225QC design The Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED monitor makes an outstanding first impression. The company opts for a white hue that’s attractive and distinctive. It’s a far starker, ultra-bright look than Dell’s photos of the monitor let on, and rather close to the tone and color of the material used on some past Alienware monitors, like the Alienware AW3225QF. I also like the fabric material covering the speaker system at the bottom of the monitor. Dell has used that design touch on past monitors with built-in speakers, but it still looks attractive. Matthew Smith / Foundry The design is functional, too. It ships with an ergonomically adjustable stand that has a moderately sized flat base and doesn’t intrude too much on your desk. The stand adjusts 110mm in height, tilts 25 degrees, and swivels 60 degrees, which is a typical range of adjustments for this category. The monitor doesn’t rotate into portrait orientation, however. The monitor also has a built-in power supply. Some QD-OLED monitors use an external power supply due to their higher peak power requirements, but that’s not the case here, so you won’t have a power brick lurking under your desk. Matthew Smith / Foundry Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED S3225QC connectivity I’ll have a lot of positive things to say about the Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED monitor through the rest of this review, but there’s one weakness that will take it out of contention for some. The connectivity. The monitor has just two video inputs: one HDMI 2.1 input and one USB-C input with support for DisplayPort 1.4. Both can drive the monitor at its full 4K resolution and 120Hz refresh rate, but two video inputs are slim for a monitor in this category. Many competitors offer at least three video inputs, and many have four. The USB-C port at least handles both DisplayPort and up to 90 watts of USB-C power delivery, so it’s a solid option for connecting a Windows or Mac laptop that supports USB-C. Downstream connectivity is limited, too. You’re looking at just two USB-C ports, both supporting 15 watts of USB Power Delivery and 5Gbps of data. One port is on the back and the other is hidden in a pop-out hub on the front. I can see what Dell is going for here, as the Dell 32 Plus 4K’s price is reasonable considering its other features. Dell clearly decided to keep connectivity to the essentials and spend the monitor’s budget elsewhere. Ultimately, you’ll have to decide for yourself if that makes sense for you. If you have a desktop computer and a laptop, this is enough. But if you also want to connect game consoles (or other HDMI devices), you’ll need to buy an HDMI hub. Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED S3225QC menus and features The Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED’s settings can be adjusted with a joystick located behind the monitor’s lower-right bezel or with Dell’s Display and Peripheral Manager software. Both options work well, as Dell has clearly labeled menus that are easy to understand. However, the monitor’s image quality settings are a bit limited. The monitor has a variety of preset modes including a creator mode, which supports the sRGB, BT.709, DCI-P3, and Display P3 color spaces. There’s also a custom color mode for manual R/G/B adjustment. But that’s it. There’s no precise color temperature or gamma adjustments. It’s fine for most situations, but demanding content creators who want a high degree of control over image quality will be disappointed. The monitor includes a dark stabilizer, a feature common for gaming monitors. It can elevate the brightness of dark areas of the display to make foes easier to see. You won’t find other gaming features like an on-screen crosshair, however. Other features include a 4:3 aspect ratio mode and multiple picture-in-picture and picture-by-picture modes. The Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED’s speakers are louder, clearer, and offer far better bass than the underpowered stereo speakers common to PC monitors. Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED S3225QC audio The Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED’s audio performance deserves special mention, as the monitor has five speakers, each with 5 watts of power for a total of 25 watts. It also has support for spatial audio, which means it can adjust the audio across the speakers to provide a 3D effect. To do this, the monitor includes a camera in the lower bezel. Dell doesn’t intend it for video conferencing (and, in fact, Windows doesn’t detect it). Instead, the camera keeps track of the user’s head position to adjust the spatial audio. The spatial audio feature works reasonably well, providing some sense of 3D surround in test clips. The main issue will be finding content that supports it, because it’s rare, especially on a PC. Most people use a monitor for PC software, games, and streaming Spotify or YouTube through a web browser. Aside from some AAA games, like Cyberpunk 2077 and Hellblade: Senua’s Sacrifice, there’s not a lot of spatial audio to enjoy. I’m also not convinced the speaker system delivers a good spatial experience. Spatial Audio certainly sounds different, but I didn’t hear the same pinpoint precision I’ve heard from headphones that support it. Fortunately, the 25-watt speaker system has other advantages. The speakers are louder, clearer, and offer far better bass than the underpowered stereo speakers common to PC monitors. The Dell’s speaker system can still sound muddy at very high volume, but it’s clear at more modest levels. Also, because the speakers are so loud—and a couple feet from your face—you’ll likely want to keep them at 25 to 50 percent of their maximum.   The Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED’s speakers are solid for games, music, watching Netflix—you name it. Audiophiles will still want a system with a subwoofer and better separation between stereo channels, but for most people, this will completely remove the need for external PC speakers. Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED S3225QC SDR image quality As its name implies, the Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED has a Samsung QD-OLED panel. This type of panel is incredibly popular in 4K OLED monitors, and it generally provides outstanding image quality. Matthew Smith / Foundry First up is SDR brightness. This is a traditional weak spot for QD-OLED monitors, and the Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED maintains that with a maximum sustained SDR brightness of 246 nits. That is right in line with other OLED monitors. However, IPS monitors like the Dell U3225QE and BenQ PD2730S will often exceed 400 nits. The Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED also has a glossy display coat, so glare can be an issue. The monitor’s brightness is more than adequate for a room with blinds or shades, but you may have an uncomfortable viewing experience in a room with bright, sunlit windows. Matthew Smith / Foundry Contrast is where QD-OLED typically leaps ahead of monitors with an LCD panel. OLED monitors can achieve a perfect minimum luminance of zero nits, which leads to an immersive, contrast-rich image. The Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED follows the trend here. It provides a great sense of dimensionality that will draw in your eye, and it’s clearly a cut above LCD rivals. With that said, all modern OLED monitors can deliver a similar experience. The Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED’s contrast is fantastic, but it’s not an advantage over its peers. Matthew Smith / Foundry QD-OLED also leads in color gamut, meaning QD-OLED can display more colors overall. It leads the Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED to provide a color gamut that spans 100 percent of sRGB, 97 percent of DCI-P3, and 94 percent of AdobeRGB, which is similar to other QD-OLED monitors. Some LCD panel monitors can rival QD-OLED, but most can’t. LG’s WOLED also tends to fall a bit behind QD-OLED in this area. Matthew Smith / Foundry The Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED delivered an incredibly low color error that’s among the best I’ve seen from any monitor. And this, mind you, is an uncalibrated result straight out of the box. While some monitors can achieve similar values, most don’t. It’s also superb to see this level of color accuracy from a monitor that’s not sold as a “professional” content creation display. Though it certainly lacks image quality features that the most demanding professionals crave, the out-of-box image is outstanding, and makes this monitor a good fit for many video, photo, and digital art workflows. Consider how the Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED compares to the Asus ProArt PA32UCDM, for example. The ProArt’s out-of-box color accuracy is a tad behind the Dell, and the two are equals in color gamut. However, the ProArt is priced at $1,899—over twice as much as the Dell! The Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED reached mixed results in gamma and color temperature. It nailed the target gamma curve of 2.2, which means content should look about as bright as intended. But it missed the color temperature target of 6500K with a value of 6100K, which means the image is warmer than ideal. Personally, I don’t mind a warmer display, but a value near 6500K would be more neutral. The monitor also lacks color temperature controls that target precise values, so owners may have trouble calibrating the monitor to hit their preferred color temperature target. This is an area where the Asus ProArt PA32UCDM has a big advantage, as it hits better color temperature results and provides users a lot more control over the image. The Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED’s sharpness is solid. The monitor’s 31.5-inch QD-OLED panel provides 3840×2160 resolution, which works out to about 140 pixels per inch. That’s a bit less than the 160 ppi of a typical 27-inch 4K monitor, but much better than the roughly 100 ppi of a 27-inch 1440p monitor. True sharpness freaks might notice pixelation around small fonts, but it looks plenty sharp when playing games or watching Netflix. Of course, all 32-inch 4K QD-OLED monitors look similar in this regard. Overall, the Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED delivers a bright, vibrant, accurate, high-contrast image. Its overall SDR image quality is rather similar to other QD-OLED monitors, and most shoppers won’t see much difference between the Dell and QD-OLED competitors from Samsung, Asus, or even LG. Still, the Dell does notch a few wins, most notably in color accuracy and gamma results, both of which are better than average. Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED S3225QC HDR image quality The Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED is VESA DisplayHDR 400 True Black certified, which is typical for a QD-OLED monitor. But it also supports Dolby Vision, which is unusual and hints at above-average HDR performance. Unfortunately, the monitor didn’t live up to that expectation. Matthew Smith / Foundry A look at the graph tells a simple story. The Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED is about as bright as the alternatives when large portions of the screen are lit. However, it falls behind in HDR highlights. Small, bright, high-contrast objects don’t have the same pop that’s found on some competitive monitors. This was true across a variety of HDR modes, and oddly, the Peak HDR 1000 mode was a little dimmer than the Movie HDR mode. That’s not to say HDR looks bad, as the Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED still delivers the contrast and color required to help HDR look great. But the lack of brightness is an issue, so consider a different QD-OLED monitor if you want HDR highlights to sizzle. Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED S3225QC motion performance The Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED has a refresh rate of up to 120Hz and can handle Adaptive Sync with official AMD FreeSync Premium Pro support (Nvidia G-Sync also functioned in my testing, but support is unofficial). While there’s certainly similarly priced monitors with high refresh rates and broader Adaptive Sync support, like Alienware’s AW3425DW, the Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED’s enhanced refresh rate and Adaptive Sync support are notable, as it’s sold for general use rather than gaming. Motion clarity isn’t at the top of the pack, but it’s good. The refresh rate of 120Hz, paired with OLED’s low pixel response times, provides modest motion blur behind fast-moving objects, and fast camera pans in 3D games deliver good clarity. Scrolling text is also much easier to read than on a 60Hz monitor. Once again, gaming monitors have the edge here: Most 4K QD-OLED monitors can now handle 240Hz. But the Dell 32 Plus 4K’s motion clarity is great for its category. It’s also worth pondering if a 240Hz refresh rate could provide a meaningful upgrade for your use. You’ll only enjoy the full benefit in games that can hit frame rates up to 240 frames per second, which can be difficult to achieve at 4K resolution. Gamers with beefy GPUs will see gains from a 240Hz gaming monitor, but 120Hz is a fit for users with more modest hardware. Should you buy the Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED? The Dell 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED is an easy recommendation for most shoppers. It has outstanding image quality, good motion clarity, supports Adaptive Sync, and includes built-in speakers that beat the competition. The monitor’s downsides include limited connectivity, which provides just two video inputs (one HDMI 2.1, one USB-C with DisplayPort), and modest HDR performance despite Dolby Vision badging. If you can deal with that, the 32 Plus 4K QD-OLED is a great do-it-all monitor sold at an appealing $849.99 MSRP. Read...

I’m a standing desk evangelist. Ask anyone in my life who’s a desk worker and they’ll tell you that I’ve badgered them about switching. Whether it’s expensive or affordable, it doesn’t matter—just get one! But I wasn’t always like this. When I first tried standing desks over a decade ago, I didn’t approve. My feet ached, my setup was suboptimal, I didn’t feel the benefits, and it was a hell of a lot more work than just putting my feet up while I tapped away at my PC. But now? I’d never go back. Here are the top reasons why I went from standing desk skeptic to standing desk convert. It helps my back pain and posture This is the original and still best reason I have for using a standing desk. In the past, I wrote about my favorite desk accessories for back pain and posture issues. After years of poor posture, too much smartphone use, and a sedentary combination of desk work and PC gaming, I found myself with recurring pinched nerves and distracting back pain. Switching to a standing desk was the first step to reversing that dangerous debilitating trend, and though it still isn’t perfect today, it’s much better than it was. I attribute that to my standing desk. Just searching for home office work posture images gives me PTSD. This woman’s back is going to be ruined inside six months.Standsome Worklifestyle / Unsplash Today, I spend most of my days standing, not sitting. I stand to work, I stand to game, and though I have a few seated sessions throughout the day to rest, it’s only for a short while—and then I’m back up again. Standing keeps me more upright. Plus, I can better control my desk environment so that my monitor is at the right height and my wrists are held at a neutral angle while typing. It keeps me moving, too. I don’t just sit still, slowly caving forward as I grow tired. I’m able to dance, to pace, to rock from foot to foot, or even do some flamingo legging. All of this helps prevent me from getting stuck in one bad position that slowly cements into my default. Back pain will always be something I have to contend with due to the nature of my work and choice of hobbies, but with a standing desk I have a much better chance of staving off the worst of it. It encourages me to move around more With a standing desk, I’m not just passively burning more calories than I would if I were sitting down—I’m free to move around as much as I want, whenever I want, not confined to a chair. I take full advantage of that. I’m a compulsive desk fidgeter, so when I’m standing I can more readily tap my feet, bounce from foot to foot, dance if the right tunes are playing, balance at funny angles on my foot rocker, and do full-blown exercises. When I’m proof reading, I’ll often do a small weighted exercise with some tiny dumbbells, or lower the standing desk so the monitor stays in my eyeline as I do some squats or lunges. TheStandingDesk / Unsplash Everything I’ve read suggests that regular movement is one of the best ways to thwart the circulation issues that can arise from sedentary office jobs, so I’m going to keep standing and keep moving as best as I can. Far more than I could do if seated all day. It keeps my PC at a distance When I built my first PC at 15, I wanted the biggest, baddest, fastest, and gaudiest system possible. I fitted a Thermaltake Armor with an early AMD Athlon 64+ CPU, a DFI LanParty motherboard, and the best GPU I could afford: an Nvidia GTX 6600. I also fitted it with a massive cooler with heaps of fans and some gaudy blue LEDs. I had that monster on my desk right by my face for years and somehow never noticed how loud it was. Today, that seems like the absolute worst idea possible. Thank goodness for aging gracefully. My ideas of what constitutes a great PC have, too. While I still have powerful hardware in my main office/gaming machine, I’m also more cognizant of its noise levels. I don’t want to hear from it unless there’s a problem. The PC is in a swanky Fractal Design North case, yet I don’t even really want to look at it. Just let me work and game and don’t cause any problems, thank you very much. PCs should neither be seen nor heard.Jon Martindale / Foundry And that’s something else the standing desk helps with. Short of putting my PC in another room, it’s about as far from me as I can manage in my humble home office. It’s under the desk, tucked in a corner, and I don’t see it (or even remember it exists) while I’m standing. This extra distance helps reduce PC noise levels. I’m a big fan of quiet and silent PCs, so I have all the fans and pump turned low… and when idling or writing, it’s basically inaudible. *Chef’s kiss* It let me game when I had a baby This win for standing desks is no longer relevant for me, but it’s a win I’ll always celebrate because it let me have some me time while navigating dadhood for the second time with a troubled sleeper. I won’t bore you with the details, but my daughter didn’t sleep well until she was 4 years old. Between the ages of 6 months to 18 months, I rocked her to sleep in the carrier every night so my poor wife could get a break from breastfeeding. Fortunately, it ended up letting me get some time for me, and even for us. Jon Martindale / Foundry Already a practiced standing gamer, it meant I could enjoy my new love at the time (Valheim, not my daughter) for hours while she happily slept against me. My wife even played on the laptop in the other room, so while we were passing ships in the wind otherwise, we were able to venture around a fantasy world and build the Viking homestead of our dreams, all while escaping the torment of a screaming toddler. I genuinely credit this niche benefit with saving my sanity and helping my marriage to no end, and it’s something for which I’ll always be grateful to my faithful standing desk. It makes celebrating wins more fun What do you do when you win an online match or defeat that epic boss? Punch the air? Shout “Let’s go!”? Do a little victory dance? I know I do! And that’s so much more fun when you’re standing up. It’s hard to celebrate when you’re plopped in a chair. But standing? Have at it! Ella Don / Unsplash I even enjoy more pre-emptive celebrations while standing. When playing board games via Tabletop Simulator, if I manage a particularly impressive turn of dice rolls and strategic decisions, or realize my friend is about to fall into a trap I’ve carefully planned, there’s nothing quite like some fist pumping to double down on my enjoyment of the win. It makes voice and video calls better I’m not a fan of video calls. (It’s an eye contact thing.) But if we’re going to do it, I’d rather be standing. It helps keep the air moving around me so my profuse social-sweating isn’t so obvious. And since I’m standing, I feel like my oracy skills are improved. I can speak that much more clearly, with less of my usual tendency to mumble or stutter. visuals / Unsplash I’d have to ask my editors whether they notice a difference, but I definitely feel more confident standing. It keeps my hands off-camera, too, so I can more readily fiddle with a fidget toy out of sight. I finally get the standing desk hype Standing is just a way of life for me at this point. Until I come up against some potentially severe negative health effects of standing desks—maybe circulatory issues, blood clots, varicose veins, etc.—I’m going to keep at it. It feels better, it mitigates my worst habits, and it helps me focus better. It even makes my small office feel a bit bigger, too. Sure, the upfront cost is a little high, so I don’t want to handwave the privilege on this one. But I started out with cardboard boxes under my keyboard, mouse, and monitor to ape the more expensive options. It’s doable on a budget, and I recommend it for anyone who spends more than a few hours sitting at a desk every day. Come dance like an idiot with me while we work. I think you’ll like it. Further reading: The best remote work accessories for your home office Read...

It used to be the case that nothing worth having came easy–an old adage that kept us going as we powered through repetitive manual chores, such as the ongoing maintenance required to establish a perfectly manicured lawn. Today, the biggest draw of smart home tech is its ability to unlock free time for its users. That’s time to spend with family, time to socialize, time to sit back and relax–above all, it’s time not spent mowing the lawn. If you’re guilty of obsessing over the prospect of having a green and luscious lawn, but tired of the effort it takes to maintain, robot lawn mowers such as Segway’s Navimow X3 are for you. This is the robot you’ve been looking for The Navimow X3 was built to tackle more than just your lawn—this robot lawn mower was designed to remove all your frustrations regarding robotic mowers and lawncare in general. Cordless design Segway Segway’s robot lawn mower has a wire-free setup, and that means no more trip-hazards and unsightly cable mess. If your garden is oddly shaped, then not requiring boundary wires will be a blessing. Instead, the Navimow X3 uses ultrasonic sensors and 3D vision to navigate the yard and avoid obstacles, including pets and kids who might be playing in the yard. It doesn’t matter how complex is the garden layout, how uneven is the terrain, or how steep is the slope, its larger-than-average cutting blade and accelerated mowing tech will precision-cut your lawn at pace. Autonomous operation Segway Once installed, the Navimow X3 operates fully autonomously. Tasks are scheduled based on the weather, mowing happens automatically and, when done, it will return to the charging station to prepare itself for the next outing. Not only can this robot recharge itself, but it will do so twice as fast as many other robotic mowers on the market. Keeping larger lawns in top shape typically requires a lot of manual labor. The idea of a using a robot to remove some of this hard work is welcome, but the robot also needs to be able to quickly and efficiently make its way around the yard, and complete the full job properly. Thanks to its speedy mowing skills, large cutting blades, and ability to quickly recharge itself when needed, the Navimow X3 is more efficient for maintaining larger lawns than many of its competitors. And that means it can process enormous lawns up to 5,000 square meters in just 24 hours. Wake up to the smell of freshly cut grass The beauty of this robot lawn mower is you can even set it up to run super-early in the morning, or super-late at night. Since it doesn’t make much noise—just 60db— it won’t bother your neighbors. Using the app you can configure the mowing schedule, customize cutting areas, and track progress at a glance. Make the neighbors jealous Your neighbors might watch over the fence with curiosity and awe, but you needn’t worry about anyone borrowing your little yard helper. Segway fits the Navimow X3 with antitheft GPS tracking, which lets you immediately track the robot’s location, and causes it to blare out an alarm if it’s lifted and removed from the boundary you set. This app is easy to integrate with Google Home and Alexa, so you can give voice commands to your smart home assistant to send out the Navimow X3 to do its job. Automate your lawncare today If you just can’t wait to get started, Segway Navimow has an Online to Offline service for the X3 Series robotic mowers. This means you can order the mower online and go pick it up in person from an authorized retailer in your vicinity, or stop by for a product demo or usage tips. View Segway Navimow X3 Series The Navimow X3 Series retails for $2,299. You can also get various accessories to make your lawn even more beautiful, like an edge trimmer, or a signal enhancement antenna. For small-to-medium lawns, Segway is currently offering an early Prime Day deal of 25% off the Navimow i Series. Read...